« Islamophobia and Media Influence | Main | Hamas: A Possible Partner For Peace? »

One White Nationalist Site Praises Proposed Israeli Anti-Convert Legislation

Filed under: Anti-Semitism, Israel, Judaism, Racism

Let me introduce you to Hatchet Jack.

Hatchet Jack is an "Alaskan fisherman and outdoorsman" with links to anti-Semitic sites such as "Jew Watch" on the front page of his blog. While there is quite a bit of White Nationalist filth scattered throughout the site, this particular article (with a hat tip to the Anarchist Rabbi) caught my interest because it illustrates a Jewish ethical teaching beautifully.

Izzy is his slang for Israel.

Only racial (not converted) jews allowed in Izzy

Hatchet jack:

The Israeli law of return has always been aimed at keeping Israel a "jewish" state. A former member of the Israeli Supreme Court, Haim Cohen, described the system that applies to Jews and Palestinians in Israel as similar to the Nuremberg laws of Nazi Germany: "...the bitter irony of fate, which has led the same biological and racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infamous Nuremberg laws, serves as a basis for the definition of Judaism within the State of Israel." Badi, J. (1960). Fundamental Laws Of The State Of Israel. New York. p.156....

Now Israeli jews don't have to worry about shunning goy converts. The law of return has excluded Gentile converts, closing the loophole which threatened Israel's apartheid objectives.

Who can blame Israel? I cannot. I would like to see mother Europe and her colonies, including North America, preserved as an homeland exclusively for White people. That means people of wholely European descent. Thus, this doesn't bother me.

What does disturb me are the jews who advocate open borders in America, and interracial marriage. Quite often they preach one thing for Israel, and something entirely different in the United States.


And there you have it.

The Nation of Israel is given the Divine charge in the Torah to be a nation set apart from the other nations of the world, distinct "b'shmam, b'malbusham u'v'lshonam", in their names, their style of dress and in their language. We are supposed to -- and if we choose not to, G-d forces us to -- be different in the way we call ourselves, the way others see us, and the way we communicate.

The commentator Rash"i in Daniel 11 tells us that Antiochus, the Greek king of Chanukah infamy, would kill anyone who called themselves a Jew. The end of the Book of Esther tells us that many people called themselves Jews following the Purim incident. Never do we find that the word "Jew" was tied to familial lineage -- as it is written in the Torah, "There shall be one Torah for the convert and for the native-born."

When a convert is not given said status, by default, one is establishing a de facto anti-halachic genetic premise for who can be called a "Jew." If this is to be codified in Israeli legislation by the Rabbinate, this will be not only a slap in the face to the Divine Law which says otherwise, but it will also give creedence to the Neo-Nazi racialist philosophy.

That Jew is a race, and that lands are set up for races of people.

Instead of the pan-racial, international identity of "Jew", Israel, through this legislation, if it passes (Rahmana litzlan) , will have chosen to define itself by the racial identity of "Semite" or perhaps "Israelite". A secular Israel defined by Hitler, which defines Jews contrary to the way the Torah does.

The Talmud tells us in Tractate Bava Metzia that converts' insult is prohibited up to 36 times by G-d in the Torah, yet somehow a labor issue makes all of these Divine exhortations play second-fiddle.

Conversion to Judaism is a unique process -- conversion to Islam does not make one an "Arab", conversion to Hinduism does not give one a similar link to the Vedas. But conversion to Judaism, in every classical text, in effect changes one's very DNA: the DNA in the cells of the convert has become "Jewish DNA" and they are now a "Jew", affected by anti-Semitism and only differing from their co-religionists by an ethnic prefix ("black Jew", "Asian Jew"). One has their own personal portion of Torah (cheilek ba'Torah) which was predestined for them from time immemorial. The convert to Judaism becomes part of the Jewish people, a child of Abraham -- literally.

Instead of sticking with the Torah definitions of our ancestors, the Israeli Rabbinate would instead choose to utilize a non-Torah mindset utilized by Nazis?

Israel is the only "Jewish state" -- but can it please start acting more like a goy echad ba'aretz, a unique nation? Importing American and European fashion is enough -- don't import the racism, racialism, and elitism.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.thisisbabylon.net/daily/mt-tb.cgi/185

Comments

This ties in to the overall pseudo-philosophical question of "what is a Jew".
As I see it, you're saying that Judaism is a matter of self-identification. מתיהדים is a reflexive verb, if you want to reference the Purim fairy-tale.
Not to mention the entire issue of Israel the people vs Israel the state MIBSSIOD. If the state is defined as Jewish, than all the non-kike Israelites are excluded from full participation in it; making it undemocratic, as has been pointed out.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Y-LOVE - This is Babylon on MySpace

Y-LOVE on Modular Moods

Mailing List

If we're going to change the world, then we're going to need to link up. Subscribe to the This is Babylon newsletter for updates on new site features, action alerts, headlines, news, and more.